Agents remove the human interpreter, not the obligation
Regulatory processes have always relied on people who know which definition, exception and rule really applies.
Every regulatory process has a hidden control: the person who interprets it.
They know which definition really applies inside the institution, which exception is tolerated, which source takes priority, and which rule changed since the documentation was last updated. Their knowledge is part of how the process runs, yet it is written down nowhere.
The obligation stays
As agents move into regulatory processes, that interpreter leaves the execution path. The obligation does not. The institution still has to explain the output, evidence the source and prove the control. An agent working from documentation alone applies the documented process, not the one the business actually runs.
Capturing what people know
xflow captures domain knowledge as part of the process it belongs to. Where the code and data cannot explain a step, our engineers ask the person who knows and record the answer against that step, with its owner. The rule an agent applies is then the same rule the business uses, validated and evidenced.
Accountability does not move to the machine. It becomes explicit enough for an agent to work within it.